From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Feb 2 12:52:16 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Votes Message-ID: Folks i just cast the following votes (Tim i made one of your comments a little less strident - hope you don?t mind) Mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? APPROVE for Publication ISO/FDIS 15489-1 (Ed 2) Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: Concepts and principles - with the following comment: To the ASIST standards committee member who reviewed this the metadata section seemed minimal and not of much use Comment provided by Timothy Dickey YES on Periodic Review: ANSI/NISO/ISO 12083-1995 (R2009), Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup - withdrawal of NISO version of the ISO standard Note: This does not mean NISO is abandoning SGML - NISO sometimes withdraws its version of ISO standards in order to avoid having to maintain the NISO standard in the event of changes to the equivalent ISO standard in order to keep the two standards in sync Voted APPROVE for publication ISO/DIS 17068-Information and documentation - Trusted third party repository for digital records - with the following comment: The ASIST standards committee member who reviewed the document noted that the provisions in 6.7 and 7.4 for security operations on the part of such a third-party service seem extremely minimal, considering the broad scope of the business and healthcare applications envisioned in the introduction Comment provided by Timothy Dickey -------------- next part -------------- Folks i just cast the following votes (Tim i made one of your comments a little less strident - hope you don?t mind) Mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? APPROVE for Publication ISO/FDIS 15489-1 (Ed 2) Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: Concepts and principles - with the following comment: To the ASIST standards committee member who reviewed this the metadata section seemed minimal and not of much use Comment provided by Timothy Dickey YES on Periodic Review: ANSI/NISO/ISO 12083-1995 (R2009), Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup - withdrawal of NISO version of the ISO standard Note: This does not mean NISO is abandoning SGML - NISO sometimes withdraws its version of ISO standards in order to avoid having to maintain the NISO standard in the event of changes to the equivalent ISO standard in order to keep the two standards in sync Voted APPROVE for publication ISO/DIS 17068-Information and documentation - Trusted third party repository for digital records - with the following comment: The ASIST standards committee member who reviewed the document noted that the provisions in 6.7 and 7.4 for security operations on the part of such a third-party service seem extremely minimal, considering the broad scope of the business and healthcare applications envisioned in the introduction Comment provided by Timothy Dickey From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Feb 2 13:22:56 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] votes Message-ID: <6B9707B3-0FD3-401C-9E57-756D944937B9@yahoo.com> Im not sure if this went through so Im resending it Folks i just cast the following votes (Tim i made one of your comments a little less strident - hope you don?t mind) Mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? APPROVE for Publication ISO/FDIS 15489-1 (Ed 2) Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: Concepts and principles - with the following comment: To the ASIST standards committee member who reviewed this the metadata section seemed minimal and not of much use Comment provided by Timothy Dickey YES on Periodic Review: ANSI/NISO/ISO 12083-1995 (R2009), Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup - withdrawal of NISO version of the ISO standard Note: This does not mean NISO is abandoning SGML - NISO sometimes withdraws its version of ISO standards in order to avoid having to maintain the NISO standard in the event of changes to the equivalent ISO standard in order to keep the two standards in sync Voted APPROVE for publication ISO/DIS 17068-Information and documentation - Trusted third party repository for digital records - with the following comment: The ASIST standards committee member who reviewed the document noted that the provisions in 6.7 and 7.4 for security operations on the part of such a third-party service seem extremely minimal, considering the broad scope of the business and healthcare applications envisioned in the introduction Comment provided by Timothy Dickey -------------- next part -------------- Im not sure if this went through so Im resending it Folks i just cast the following votes (Tim i made one of your comments a little less strident - hope you don?t mind) Mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? APPROVE for Publication ISO/FDIS 15489-1 (Ed 2) Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: Concepts and principles - with the following comment: To the ASIST standards committee member who reviewed this the metadata section seemed minimal and not of much use Comment provided by Timothy Dickey YES on Periodic Review: ANSI/NISO/ISO 12083-1995 (R2009), Electronic Manuscript Preparation and Markup - withdrawal of NISO version of the ISO standard Note: This does not mean NISO is abandoning SGML - NISO sometimes withdraws its version of ISO standards in order to avoid having to maintain the NISO standard in the event of changes to the equivalent ISO standard in order to keep the two standards in sync Voted APPROVE for publication ISO/DIS 17068-Information and documentation - Trusted third party repository for digital records - with the following comment: The ASIST standards committee member who reviewed the document noted that the provisions in 6.7 and 7.4 for security operations on the part of such a third-party service seem extremely minimal, considering the broad scope of the business and healthcare applications envisioned in the introduction Comment provided by Timothy Dickey From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Feb 2 16:40:39 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" References: <20160202213106.3802B29982F0@list.niso.org> Message-ID: Anyone have a problem with this? mark > Begin forwarded message: > > From: > Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" > Date: February 2, 2016 at 4:31:05 PM EST > To: needleman_mark at yahoo.com > > "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" has opened. > Ballot Title: Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson > > Question > Should the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson be approved? > > Closing Date: Friday, 26 February 2016 @ 11:59 pm EST > > Description > SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT > > > > This is a ballot to approve the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chairperson of TC46/SC11 for a three-year term from 2017 to 2019. > > > > Please be advised that the term of Mr David Moldrich as Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11 "Archives/records management" subcommittee will expire at the end of 2016. > > > > A new vote by correspondence will be open for TC 46 members consultation on SC 11 Secretary proposal to nominate Ms Judith Ellis, Managing Director of Enterprise Knowledge Pty Ltd, Australian participating expert of SC 11, as new Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11. > > > > The nomination document, including Judith's bio, is attached. > > > > Your voting options are: > > > > Yes - approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 (comments optional) > > No - do not approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 (comments required) > > Abstain from voting read less > > Vote > Yes > No > Abstain > Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group > Date Opened: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 @ 4:15 pm EST > Referenced Items > N864 _ISO-TC46_N2580_CIB Consultation for ISO_TC46_SC11 new chair.pdf (876K) 2016-02-02 Download | View Details -------------- next part -------------- Anyone have a problem with this? mark Begin forwarded message: From: <[1]admin at list.niso.org> Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" Date: February 2, 2016 at 4:31:05 PM EST To: [2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" has opened. Ballot Title: [3]Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson _________________________________________________________________ Question Should the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson be approved? Closing Date: Friday, 26 February 2016 @ 11:59 pm EST Description SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT This is a ballot to approve the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chairperson of TC46/SC11 for a three-year term from 2017 to 2019. Please be advised that the term of Mr David Moldrich as Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11 "Archives/records management" subcommittee will expire at the end of 2016. A new vote by correspondence will be open for TC 46 members consultation on SC 11 Secretary proposal to nominate Ms Judith Ellis, Managing Director of Enterprise Knowledge Pty Ltd, Australian participating expert of SC 11, as new Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11. The nomination document, including Judith's bio, is attached. Your voting options are: Yes - approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 (comments optional) No - do not approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 (comments required) Abstain from voting read less [4]Vote * Yes * No * Abstain _________________________________________________________________ Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group Date Opened: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 @ 4:15 pm EST _________________________________________________________________ Referenced Items N864 _ISO-TC46_N2580_CIB Consultation for ISO_TC46_SC11 new chair.pdf (876K) 2016-02-02 [5]Download | [6]View Details References 1. mailto:admin at list.niso.org 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=693 4. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=693 5. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/download.php/16032 6. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/document.php?document_id=16032 From thornbug at oclc.org Wed Feb 3 07:37:43 2016 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:37:43 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" In-Reply-To: References: <20160202213106.3802B29982F0@list.niso.org> Message-ID: I have no problem with this -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 4:41 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" Anyone have a problem with this? mark > Begin forwarded message: > > From: > Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" > Date: February 2, 2016 at 4:31:05 PM EST > To: needleman_mark at yahoo.com > > "Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson" has opened. > Ballot Title: Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as > TC46/SC11 new Chairperson > > > Question > Should the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson be approved? > > Closing Date: Friday, 26 February 2016 @ 11:59 pm EST > > Description > SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT > > > > This is a ballot to approve the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chairperson of TC46/SC11 for a three-year term from 2017 to 2019. > > > > Please be advised that the term of Mr David Moldrich as Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11 "Archives/records management" subcommittee will expire at the end of 2016. > > > > A new vote by correspondence will be open for TC 46 members consultation on SC 11 Secretary proposal to nominate Ms Judith Ellis, Managing Director of Enterprise Knowledge Pty Ltd, Australian participating expert of SC 11, as new Chair of ISO/TC 46/SC 11. > > > > The nomination document, including Judith's bio, is attached. > > > > Your voting options are: > > > > Yes - approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 (comments > optional) > > No - do not approve Ms. Judith Ellis as the new Chair of TC46/SC11 > (comments required) > > Abstain from voting read less > > Vote > > Yes > No > Abstain > Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group > Date Opened: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 @ 4:15 pm EST Referenced Items > N864 _ISO-TC46_N2580_CIB Consultation for ISO_TC46_SC11 new chair.pdf (876K) 2016-02-02 Download | View Details From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Sat Feb 13 15:22:24 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] standards issue Message-ID: <9A1C749B-728C-403C-93C7-B56705C7D876@yahoo.com> Irene i don?t seem to have your email address so I?m hoping this reaches you. Dick will probably also contact you A little bit of bad news. Im afraid we aren?t going to be able to do a special issue of the Bulletin on standards in the fall. We only managed so far ro get a commitment for 1 article (and a possible for a second one) - and since time is getting short Im hoping we can postpone to a later issue of the Bulletin. I still think its a good idea and something we should do but it doesn?t look like the timing is going to work out for the fall My apologies about this and i hope we can get something together at a later date Mark From mhlava at accessinn.com Mon Feb 15 17:15:42 2016 From: mhlava at accessinn.com (Marjorie Hlava) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:15:42 -0700 Subject: [Asis-standards] [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot reminder: "ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision" Message-ID: <8089DD16-5D05-4024-A9B2-8F21477A599D@accessinn.com> I have voted Yes - but it is really a NO Vote. My comments as follows This is a confusing vote. Are we voting against the change or voting to put the ballot forward? oR does the vote not matter and this is just a vehicle to collect comments? I don't think it a minor revision but a change in direction for the ISSN, perhaps implemented by country maintenance agency creating a patchwork of compliance and a danger to the long time worth of the standard. Ballot Title: ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision Question Do you have any comments on the amendment to ISO 3297-2007? Closing Date: Friday, 18 March 2016 @ 11:59 pm EDT Description The International ISSN Centre has requested that this Subcommittee Resolution ballot be put forward to make a ?minor revision? (as described in ISO Directives, Part 1, Section 2.9.3.2.) of the ISSN standard. Your voting options are: Yes - you have something to say (comments required) No - you don't have any comments Abstain from voting (comments optional) -------------- next part -------------- I have voted Yes - but it is really a NO Vote. My comments as follows This is a confusing vote. Are we voting against the change or voting to put the ballot forward? oR does the vote not matter and this is just a vehicle to collect comments? I don't think it a minor revision but a change in direction for the ISSN, perhaps implemented by country maintenance agency creating a patchwork of compliance and a danger to the long time worth of the standard. Ballot Title: [1]ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision _________________________________________________________________ Question Do you have any comments on the amendment to ISO 3297-2007? Closing Date: Friday, 18 March 2016 @ 11:59 pm EDT Description The International ISSN Centre has requested that this Subcommittee Resolution ballot be put forward to make a ?minor revision? (as described in ISO Directives, Part 1, Section 2.9.3.2.) of the ISSN standard. Your voting options are: Yes - you have something to say (comments required) No - you don't have any comments Abstain from voting (comments optional) References 1. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=694 From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Fri Feb 26 12:47:40 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] new votes Message-ID: <3BD78381-E008-43DA-A3FD-E7DE5AAFD9EE@yahoo.com> Folks i just cast the votes below. There are a few more votes due in March which Ill be sending out soon - i try to send things with enough time for people to review them but not too early so people forget about them - if you think i should be sending things out earlier than i currently am let me know mark ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? YES on the publication of Systematic Review of ISO 16175-1:2010 Information and documentation - Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments - Part 1: Overview and statement of principles Confirm on the Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson -------------- next part -------------- Folks i just cast the votes below. There are a few more votes due in March which Ill be sending out soon - i try to send things with enough time for people to review them but not too early so people forget about them - if you think i should be sending things out earlier than i currently am let me know mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????? YES on the publication of Systematic Review of ISO 16175-1:2010 Information and documentation - Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments - Part 1: Overview and statement of principles Confirm on the Approval of the nomination of Ms. Judith Ellis as TC46/SC11 new Chairperson From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Mon Feb 29 12:07:23 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] upcoming votes Message-ID: <3C843D23-4590-4FA6-B806-469B4B764EDD@yahoo.com> Folks some upcoming votes - I believe i already sent out the 1st 3 (at least i hope i did) - but if anyone needs any of those documents just let me know mark ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1)Systematic Review of ISO 16175-2:2011 Information and documentation -- Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments -- Part 2: Guidelines and functional requirements for digital records management systems Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/3/2016 2) Systematic Review of ISO 16175-3:2010 Information and documentation -- Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments -- Part 3: Guidelines and functional requirements for records in business systems Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/6/2016 3) Systematic Review of ISO 17933:2000 Information and documentation - GEDI ? Generic Electronic Document Interchange Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/7/2016 2 New votes: (documents attached) DIS vote on 4) ISO/CD 20614 - ISOCD 20614 DEPIP N994 This is a ballot for the TC46/SC4, ISO/CD 20614, Data Exchange Protocol for Interoperability and Preservation for approval for registration as a DIS in accordance with 2.5.6 of part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives This document gives a standardized framework for the various information exchanges (data and its metadata) between the repositories and their partners. Interchanges between several repositories (repositories integrated in organizations, public repositories, storage service suppliers) will also be considered. The aim of this standard is to promote the interoperability between the information systems of these actors and thus facilitate a better harmonization of software developments. This standardization work resulted in activity diagrams and data models according to the UML standard, as well as in message definitions according to XML schemas. This standard presents useful elements for building applications or additional application modules upstream and downstream of the messages. In particular, it defines the necessary data handled by these systems. This information will then be used to generate or to receive messages, by mapping between the model of the relevant databases and the XML schemas of the transactions envisaged in this standard. The described standard is generic and adaptable to all types of information, in a paper or born digital format. The situations that are covered in this standard include the Transfer, the Delivery, the Disposal, the Modification, and the Restitution. The standard defines scenarios that Repositories and their partners use to exchange information in the framework of the transactions mentioned above. It also proposes an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the scenarios. The data exchange protocol is intended in particular for: a) producers, in order to complete/improve their business applications; b) repositories, in order to standardize Data Objects reception and delivery and to support for instance the development or the improvement of multi-site consultation portals; c) software systems developers in order to enable interoperable data exchange processes between Repositories and their partners; d) third parties supplying exchange services working for Originating agencies and who can be required by these Originating agencies to transfer documents to Repositories; e) storage service suppliers. Actors with a managerial role will be able to rely on this standard to: a) define their interoperability processes for preservation or align their already existing interoperability processes with best practices b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever are the descriptive models used. The standard is limited to information exchanges between the Repository and its partners. Internal organization of the actor?s information systems is also excluded. Information received in conformity with the data exchange model is destined to be handled by various components. The components, however, are not the object of this standard. The standard does not specify: - records management process; - how messages are supposed to be transferred and exchanged between the actors1; - how digital Data Objects are transferred with the message (packaging format); - the precise list of the accepted formats of the electronic files transferred by a Transferring agency to a Repository; - the naming conventions that can apply to the messages themselves; - the information descriptive model2; - the implementation specifics3; - the methods to dispose Data Objects4; - data recovery, that is to say, the full restitution of the concerned information in a reusable way and as contracted; - exchanges between a Control authority and another Control authority; - features for information retrieval. All these aspects shall be negotiated by the actors of the exchange and shall be determined by the Exchange process agreement between the actors when initiating the process. The impacts of major risks (for instance disappearance or inability of an actor) are also excluded from the scope of the standard. Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/10/2016 5) ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision The International ISSN Centre has requested that this Subcommittee Resolution ballot be put forward to make a ?minor revision? (as described in ISO Directives, Part 1, Section 2.9.3.2.) of the ISSN standard. Your voting options are: Yes - you have something to say (comments required) No - you don't have any comments Abstain from voting (comments optional) Marjorie Hlava has already provided comments on this Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/17/2016 -------------- next part -------------- Folks some upcoming votes - I believe i already sent out the 1st 3 (at least i hope i did) - but if anyone needs any of those documents just let me know mark ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? 1)Systematic Review of ISO 16175-2:2011 Information and documentation -- Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments -- Part 2: Guidelines and functional requirements for digital records management systems Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/3/2016 2) Systematic Review of ISO 16175-3:2010 Information and documentation -- Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments -- Part 3: Guidelines and functional requirements for records in business systems Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/6/2016 3) Systematic Review of ISO 17933:2000 Information and documentation - GEDI ? Generic Electronic Document Interchange Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/7/2016 2 New votes: (documents attached) DIS vote on 4) ISO/CD 20614 - ISOCD 20614 DEPIP N994 This is a ballot for the TC46/SC4, ISO/CD 20614, Data Exchange Protocol for Interoperability and Preservation for approval for registration as a DIS in accordance with 2.5.6 of part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives This document gives a standardized framework for the various information exchanges (data and its metadata) between the repositories and their partners. Interchanges between several repositories (repositories integrated in organizations, public repositories, storage service suppliers) will also be considered. The aim of this standard is to promote the interoperability between the information systems of these actors and thus facilitate a better harmonization of software developments. This standardization work resulted in activity diagrams and data models according to the UML standard, as well as in message definitions according to XML schemas. This standard presents useful elements for building applications or additional application modules upstream and downstream of the messages. In particular, it defines the necessary data handled by these systems. This information will then be used to generate or to receive messages, by mapping between the model of the relevant databases and the XML schemas of the transactions envisaged in this standard. The described standard is generic and adaptable to all types of information, in a paper or born digital format. The situations that are covered in this standard include the Transfer, the Delivery, the Disposal, the Modification, and the Restitution. The standard defines scenarios that Repositories and their partners use to exchange information in the framework of the transactions mentioned above. It also proposes an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the scenarios. The data exchange protocol is intended in particular for: a) producers, in order to complete/improve their business applications; b) repositories, in order to standardize Data Objects reception and delivery and to support for instance the development or the improvement of multi-site consultation portals; c) software systems developers in order to enable interoperable data exchange processes between Repositories and their partners; d) third parties supplying exchange services working for Originating agencies and who can be required by these Originating agencies to transfer documents to Repositories; e) storage service suppliers. Actors with a managerial role will be able to rely on this standard to: a) define their interoperability processes for preservation or align their already existing interoperability processes with best practices b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever are the descriptive models used. The standard is limited to information exchanges between the Repository and its partners. Internal organization of the actor?s information systems is also excluded. Information received in conformity with the data exchange model is destined to be handled by various components. The components, however, are not the object of this standard. The standard does not specify: - records management process; - how messages are supposed to be transferred and exchanged between the actors1; - how digital Data Objects are transferred with the message (packaging format); - the precise list of the accepted formats of the electronic files transferred by a Transferring agency to a Repository; - the naming conventions that can apply to the messages themselves; - the information descriptive model2; - the implementation specifics3; - the methods to dispose Data Objects4; - data recovery, that is to say, the full restitution of the concerned information in a reusable way and as contracted; - exchanges between a Control authority and another Control authority; - features for information retrieval. All these aspects shall be negotiated by the actors of the exchange and shall be determined by the Exchange process agreement between the actors when initiating the process. The impacts of major risks (for instance disappearance or inability of an actor) are also excluded from the scope of the standard. Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/10/2016 5) ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision The International ISSN Centre has requested that this Subcommittee Resolution ballot be put forward to make a ?minor revision? (as described in ISO Directives, Part 1, Section 2.9.3.2.) of the ISSN standard. Your voting options are: Yes - you have something to say (comments required) No - you don't have any comments Abstain from voting (comments optional) Marjorie Hlava has already provided comments on this Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 3/17/2016 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 3297-2007.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 316793 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N855, TC46_SC9_ISOCD_20614_N994.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1490516 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N857_DRAFT_Amendment_ISO_3297-2007-2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 315904 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part --------------