From tdickey1 at kent.edu Wed Nov 2 08:36:19 2016 From: tdickey1 at kent.edu (TIMOTHY DICKEY) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] 2016 Votes (2) In-Reply-To: <67C8BB33-8154-43F1-9491-55118D037C44@yahoo.com> References: <67C8BB33-8154-43F1-9491-55118D037C44@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Good morning, Here is a vote to CONFIRM on both of these five-year reviews. I must say that the ISO 9707 publication statistics standard feels weaker now, moreso than its last incarnation. They deliberately put off a decision on how to include electronic book statistics until the next five-year systematic review, and they still blithely consider the "title" to be the unit of publication (which files in the face of both the publishers' practice of assigning ISBNs and librarians' even more complex practice of parsing differences between entities in bibliographic description). However, my objections do not rise to the level of a vote to withdraw, and I certainly do not have a "national expert" to nominate for revisions at this stage. All best, timothy Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS. tdickey1 at kent.edu (614) 785-1632 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Mark Needleman wrote: > Here are 2 more - 1 more note to come > > Mark > > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and > documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and > related organizations (ISIL) > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 > standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- > International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations > (ISIL) > > This International Standard specifies the International Standard > identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises a > set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of > libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum > impact on already existing systems. > An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum > or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is > responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g. > creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the > originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection > in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives, > museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these organizations > (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions). An ISIL > identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units throughout its > life. In some cases, such as when an organization has undergone a > significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another > organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL > identifier can be allocated. > > Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be > incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can > have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this International > Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library, archive, museum or > related organization, administrative unit or subordinate unit, acting > autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL is not intended to be used > to classify organizations or their services and holdings. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. > If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of > this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be > adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or > was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it > applied or used in your country without national adoption or are > products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in > regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed > to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would > like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information > in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular > information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name > and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the > following Stakeholder Categories: > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} > [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the > vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who > would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that > persons agreement if its not you) > > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- > Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, > periodicals and electronic publications > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 > standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the > production and > distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications > > This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national > statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the > production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications > (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this > International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification > (see Annex A). > > This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of > publication: > > a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or > scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed > free of charge, including > 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, > industrial and tourist advertising, and > 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the > publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress > in some branch of industry or commerce; > > b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical > examples are > 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, > 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, > 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, > 4) calendars, and > 5) electronic texts under development; > > c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including > 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the > words, and > 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical > charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, > geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. > If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of > this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be > adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or > was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it > applied or used in your country without national adoption or are > products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in > regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed > to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would > like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information > in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular > information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name > and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the > following Stakeholder Categories: > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} > [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28/2016 - If the > vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who > would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that > persons agreement if its not you) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or > know > someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of > course that persons agreement if its not you) > > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards > > -------------- next part -------------- Good morning, Here is a vote to CONFIRM on both of these five-year reviews. I must say that the ISO 9707 publication statistics standard feels weaker now, moreso than its last incarnation. They deliberately put off a decision on how to include electronic book statistics until the next five-year systematic review, and they still blithely consider the "title" to be the unit of publication (which files in the face of both the publishers' practice of assigning ISBNs and librarians' even more complex practice of parsing differences between entities in bibliographic description). However, my objections do not rise to the level of a vote to withdraw, and I certainly do not have a "national expert" to nominate for revisions at this stage. All best, timothy Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS. [1]tdickey1 at kent.edu (614) 785-1632 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Mark Needleman <[2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote: Here are 2 more? - 1 more note to come Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This International Standard specifies the International Standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises a set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum impact on already existing systems. An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g. creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives, museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these organizations (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions). An ISIL identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units throughout its life. In some cases, such as when an organization has undergone a significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL identifier can be allocated. Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this International Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library, archive, museum or related organization, administrative unit or subordinate unit, acting autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL is not intended to be used to classify organizations or their services and holdings. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who? would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) 2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification (see Annex A). This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of publication: a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed free of charge, including 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, industrial and tourist advertising, and 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress in some branch of industry or commerce; b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical examples are 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, 4) calendars, and 5) electronic texts under development; c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the words, and 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28/2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who? would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) ? ? /2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know ? ? someone who? would make a good member get me the contact details (and of ? ? course that persons agreement if its not you) _______________________________________________ Asis-standards mailing list [3]Asis-standards at asis.org [4]http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards References 1. mailto:tdickey1 at kent.edu 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org 4. http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards From tdickey1 at kent.edu Wed Nov 2 08:36:36 2016 From: tdickey1 at kent.edu (TIMOTHY DICKEY) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] 2016 votes (3) In-Reply-To: <44E28355-9993-4F81-AA23-2EBCDAC45DAF@yahoo.com> References: <44E28355-9993-4F81-AA23-2EBCDAC45DAF@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Good morning, Vote to CONFIRM both of these standards under revision review. I am particularly happy that the ISO 25964 revision has taken so much effort to include technical issues, from app interoperability to a data model, and even to considering when to include common misspellings as terms formally requiring entry into the thesaurus. All best, timothy Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS. tdickey1 at kent.edu (614) 785-1632 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Needleman wrote: > > > > > > > > The last note (for now) > > > > Mark > > > > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation > -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: > Thesauri for information retrieval > > > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 > standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and > interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for > information retrieval > > > > This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and > maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It > is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all > types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, > sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including > knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or > multimedia collections, and the items within them. > > > > This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format > for the import and export of thesaurus data. > > > > This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual > thesauri. > > > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of > back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be > useful for that purpose. > > > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software > used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the > needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus > management. > > > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote > comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended > purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be > adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard > or was it modified? > > > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it > applied or used in your country without national adoption or are > products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced > in regulations in your country? > > > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed > to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would > like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information > in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular > information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name > and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the > following Stakeholder Categories: > > > > > > Industry and Commerce > > Government > > Consumers > > Labour > > Academic and Research Bodies > > Standards Application > > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > > > Your voting options are: > > > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > > Withdraw [comments required] > > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} > [comments optional] > > > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case > the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or > know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the > persons agreement if its not you) > > > > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- > Format for information exchange > > > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 > standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for > information exchange > > > > This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized > exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material > capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. > > > > It does not define the length or the content of individual records and > does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these > specifications being the functions of an implementation format. > > > > This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a > framework designed specially for communications between data processing > systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. > > > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote > comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended > purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be > adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard > or was it modified? > > > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it > applied or used in your country without national adoption or are > products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced > in regulations in your country? > > > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed > to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would > like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information > in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular > information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name > and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the > following Stakeholder Categories: > > > > Industry and Commerce > > Government > > Consumers > > Labour > > Academic and Research Bodies > > Standards Application > > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > > > Your voting options are: > > > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > > Withdraw [comments required] > > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} > [comments optional] > > > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case > the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or > know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the > persons agreement if its not you) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards > > -------------- next part -------------- Good morning, Vote to CONFIRM both of these standards under revision review. I am particularly happy that the ISO 25964 revision has taken so much effort to include technical issues, from app interoperability to a data model, and even to considering when to include common misspellings as terms formally requiring entry into the thesaurus. All best, timothy Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS. [1]tdickey1 at kent.edu (614) 785-1632 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Needleman <[2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > The last note (for now) > > Mark > > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval > > This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them. > > This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data. > > This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri. > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose. > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: > > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not? you) > > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange > > This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. > > It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format. > > This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not? you) > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Asis-standards mailing list [3]Asis-standards at asis.org [4]http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards References 1. mailto:tdickey1 at kent.edu 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org 4. http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Wed Nov 16 13:21:10 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Reminders and a few new votes Message-ID: <842C4D5B-7AF3-47E0-955F-9009AE047C16@yahoo.com> Folks This is a reminder about a few upcoming votes plus notice of some new ones For the reminders I believe I sent out all the information earlier - but if I didn?t I apologize having been gone for a month Mark Reminders ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item Due 11/17 (tomorrow) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) Due 11/18 ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation Due 11/18 TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format Due 11/18 New Upcoming votes - relevant documents attached 1) Appointment of Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as Convenor of the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 (The ISSN standard) Due 11/21 - I assume no-one will have a problem with this - but her brief bio is: The International ISSN Center has nominated Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as convenor of the working group. Ms. B?quet was appointed as Director of the ISSN International Centre in 2014. She has previously worked as International Officer and ICT specialist in academic libraries. She holds a PhD in library and information science from University Sorbonne Nouvelle 2) SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: Call for participation in the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 Due 11/21 - if anyone wants to participate or knows some who would make a good committee member let me now 3) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications Do you recommend ISO 9707:2008 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? his is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification (see Annex A). This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of publication: a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed free of charge, including 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, industrial and tourist advertising, and 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress in some branch of industry or commerce; b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical examples are 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, 4) calendars, and 5) electronic texts under development; c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the words, and 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 11/29 - if anyone wants to participate or knows some who would make a good committee member let me know 4) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval Do you recommend ISO 25964-1:2011 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them. This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data. This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 11/30 - I hope some of you who have an interest in this will provide comments 5) ISO/TC 46/SC 10 N177: Information and documentation ? Management of the environmental conditions for archive and library holdings Do you approve the draft for publication? TR 19815 ?Environmental management for archive and library collections? provides information on recent discussions and changes in recommendations and guidance on environmental management within the cultural heritage field. Conservation research on preventive methodologies and passive control provided by specific construction methods and renovations, developments in technology for controlling the environment, and energy and climate change issues are included. TR 19815 is intended for archives and libraries and other institutions with large volumes of collections that are based on paper. It is significant to recognise that archives and libraries also have collections that include film, magnetic media, leather, and other organic, inorganic or composite materials. These institutions have a unique challenge of extending the lifespan of these materials for access and use in the present and for future generations. The environment plays a key role in extending the lifespan of all of these materials. TR 19815 is intended for use in preservation planning and ongoing environmental management of permanent storage conditions for archives and library collections and applies to all collections being permanently stored for an institution. Your voting options are: YES - approve this as a new project (nominate expert(s) if you have one; comments on the working draft are encouraged but optional) NO - do not approve this as a new project (comments required on why) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Due 12/1 - if anyone wants to participate or know of someone who would make a good participant let me know 6) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange Do you recommend ISO 2709:2008 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? his is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format. This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 12/1 - my assumption is this should be confirmed but if anyone feels differently let me know - also if the decision is made to revise if any wants to be on the committee or know of someone let me know -------------- next part -------------- Folks This is a reminder about a few upcoming votes plus notice of some new ones For the reminders I believe I sent out all the information earlier - but if I didn?t I apologize having been gone for a month Mark Reminders ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item Due 11/17 (tomorrow) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) Due 11/18 ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation Due 11/18 TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format Due 11/18 New Upcoming votes - relevant documents attached -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 2709;2008(E)-Character PDF document.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 718056 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 9707;2008(E)-Character PDF document .pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 185105 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 25964-1;2011(E)-Character PDF document .pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 7324406 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N177, ISO-TC46-SC10_N0177_ISO_TR_19815__Information_and_documentation_Management_of_the_environmental_conditions_for_archive_and_library_holdings.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1515000 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- 1) Appointment of Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as Convenor of the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 (The ISSN standard) Due 11/21 - I assume no-one will have a problem with this - but her brief bio is: The International ISSN Center has nominated Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as convenor of the working group. Ms. B?quet was appointed as Director of the ISSN International Centre in 2014. She has previously worked as International Officer and ICT specialist in academic libraries. She holds a PhD in library and information science from University Sorbonne Nouvelle 2) SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: Call for participation in the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 Due 11/21 - if anyone wants to participate or knows some who would make a good committee member let me now 3) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications Do you recommend ISO 9707:2008 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? his is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification (see Annex A). This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of publication: a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed free of charge, including 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, industrial and tourist advertising, and 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress in some branch of industry or commerce; b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical examples are 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, 4) calendars, and 5) electronic texts under development; c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the words, and 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 11/29 - if anyone wants to participate or knows some who would make a good committee member let me know 4) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval Do you recommend ISO 25964-1:2011 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them. This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data. This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 11/30 - I hope some of you who have an interest in this will provide comments 5) ISO/TC 46/SC 10 N177: Information and documentation ? Management of the environmental conditions for archive and library holdings Do you approve the draft for publication? TR 19815 ?Environmental management for archive and library collections? provides information on recent discussions and changes in recommendations and guidance on environmental management within the cultural heritage field. Conservation research on preventive methodologies and passive control provided by specific construction methods and renovations, developments in technology for controlling the environment, and energy and climate change issues are included. TR 19815 is intended for archives and libraries and other institutions with large volumes of collections that are based on paper. It is significant to recognise that archives and libraries also have collections that include film, magnetic media, leather, and other organic, inorganic or composite materials. These institutions have a unique challenge of extending the lifespan of these materials for access and use in the present and for future generations. The environment plays a key role in extending the lifespan of all of these materials. TR 19815 is intended for use in preservation planning and ongoing environmental management of permanent storage conditions for archives and library collections and applies to all collections being permanently stored for an institution. Your voting options are: YES - approve this as a new project (nominate expert(s) if you have one; comments on the working draft are encouraged but optional) NO - do not approve this as a new project (comments required on why) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Due 12/1 - if anyone wants to participate or know of someone who would make a good participant let me know 6) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange Do you recommend ISO 2709:2008 be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? his is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format. This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Due 12/1 - my assumption is this should be confirmed but if anyone feels differently let me know - also if the decision is made to revise if any wants to be on the committee or know of someone let me know From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Thu Nov 17 14:02:45 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: <4FA747C3-4FA0-45B5-A142-4560B4CA83EE@yahoo.com> Folks I just cast the following vote Approve on ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - New Work Item Proposal - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following vote Approve on ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - New Work Item Proposal - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Fri Nov 18 15:08:42 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Message-ID: Folks I just cast the following votes: Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) - CONFIRM TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format - APPROVE ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation - YES Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following votes: Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) - CONFIRM TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format - APPROVE ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation - YES Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Nov 22 07:34:00 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: <0F5B07A6-9B9D-46DF-8E9C-E5B7662AB825@yahoo.com> Folks I just cast the following vote YES ON Appointment of Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as Convenor of the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 Just a reminder that there are a few upcoming votes I?m waiting on comments for especially ISO 25964-1 Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following vote YES ON Appointment of Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as Convenor of the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 Just a reminder that there are a few upcoming votes I?m waiting on comments for especially ISO 25964-1 Mark From thornbug at oclc.org Tue Nov 22 08:44:44 2016 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:44:44 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote In-Reply-To: <0F5B07A6-9B9D-46DF-8E9C-E5B7662AB825@yahoo.com> References: <0F5B07A6-9B9D-46DF-8E9C-E5B7662AB825@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Looking at ISO 25964-1, when is this due? -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 7:34 AM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Folks I just cast the following vote YES ON Appointment of Ms. Ga?lle B?quet as Convenor of the Working Group that Will Revise ISO 3297 Just a reminder that there are a few upcoming votes I?m waiting on comments for especially ISO 25964-1 Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Nov 29 14:53:28 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: <343EE82F-BB58-4C67-9DBD-E3A6BA1A3611@yahoo.com> Folks I just cast the following vote: REVISE On Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications With the following comment: ASIST agrees with the comments from other members that the standard needs to be revised to include better statistics on the distribution of electronic media Having received no comments from other members of the committee (except for Timothy Dickey) I was going to vote confirm - but I read the comments of other voters and did a quick review of the standard and decided it would be better to vote to revise it with the comment above If anyone especially Timothy disagrees with the please let me know ASAP Also a couple of votes are coming soon soon - if anyone has comments on these let me know asap Tomorrow Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval ISO/TC 46/SC 10 N177: Information and documentation ? Management of the environmental conditions for archive and library holdings Thursday 12/1 Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following vote: REVISE On Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications With the following comment: ASIST agrees with the comments from other members that the standard needs to be revised to include better statistics on the distribution of electronic media Having received no comments from other members of the committee (except for Timothy Dickey) I was going to vote confirm - but I read the comments of other voters and did a quick review of the standard and decided it would be better to vote to revise it with the comment above If anyone especially Timothy disagrees with the please let me know ASAP Also a couple of votes are coming soon soon - if anyone has comments on these let me know asap Tomorrow Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval ISO/TC 46/SC 10 N177: Information and documentation ? Management of the environmental conditions for archive and library holdings Thursday 12/1 Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Wed Nov 30 12:27:54 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: Folks Based on discussions at the standards committee meeting in Copenhagen and some comments received by email I just cast the following ISO vote: CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks Based on discussions at the standards committee meeting in Copenhagen and some comments received by email I just cast the following ISO vote: CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval Mark From mhlava at accessinn.com Wed Nov 30 13:19:54 2016 From: mhlava at accessinn.com (margie_hlava) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:19:54 -0600 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <03514473-D21C-4498-A3E2-5E038483533B@accessinn.com> I think Hart one is fine to reaffirm to confirm. Part two of the standard will be up soon, the part about interoperability which I think could use revision Marjorie Hlava Mhlava at accessinn.com Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Mark Needleman wrote: > > > Folks > > Based on discussions at the standards committee meeting in Copenhagen and > some comments received by email I just cast the following ISO vote: > > CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and > documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- > Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards From mhlava at accessinn.com Wed Nov 30 13:38:25 2016 From: mhlava at accessinn.com (margie_hlava) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:38:25 -0600 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote In-Reply-To: <03514473-D21C-4498-A3E2-5E038483533B@accessinn.com> References: <03514473-D21C-4498-A3E2-5E038483533B@accessinn.com> Message-ID: Sorry, PART 1 Marjorie Hlava Mhlava at accessinn.com Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:19 PM, margie_hlava wrote: > > I think Hart one is fine to reaffirm to confirm. Part two of the standard will be up soon, the part about interoperability which I think could use revision > > Marjorie Hlava > Mhlava at accessinn.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 30, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Mark Needleman wrote: >> >> >> Folks >> >> Based on discussions at the standards committee meeting in Copenhagen and >> some comments received by email I just cast the following ISO vote: >> >> CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and >> documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- >> Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval >> >> Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> Asis-standards mailing list >> Asis-standards at asis.org >> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards > >