From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Fri Sep 9 15:54:06 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Message-ID: <4F61298D-A31D-442D-BCE2-CD2D76C3B386@yahoo.com> Folks i just cast the following votes in ISO Voted Confirm on the Systematic Review of ISO 3297:2007 Information and documentation -- International standard serial number (ISSN) Voted APPROVE on NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes There are a few more standards ill be sending out soon Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks i just cast the following votes in ISO Voted Confirm on the Systematic Review of ISO 3297:2007 Information and documentation -- International standard serial number (ISSN) Voted APPROVE on NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes There are a few more standards ill be sending out soon Mark From mzeng at kent.edu Fri Sep 9 17:13:45 2016 From: mzeng at kent.edu (ZENG, MARCIA) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 21:13:45 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes In-Reply-To: <4F61298D-A31D-442D-BCE2-CD2D76C3B386@yahoo.com> References: <4F61298D-A31D-442D-BCE2-CD2D76C3B386@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Mark, I probably missed some emails on the trips. About the second one on Dublin Core, can you send the comments? Also, is the "ISO25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies" under review? I have not seen the news, or I might have missed it already. marcia ________________________________ From: Asis-standards on behalf of Mark Needleman Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 3:54:06 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Folks i just cast the following votes in ISO Voted Confirm on the Systematic Review of ISO 3297:2007 Information and documentation -- International standard serial number (ISSN) Voted APPROVE on NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes There are a few more standards ill be sending out soon Mark -------------- next part -------------- Mark, I probably missed some emails on the trips. About the second one on Dublin Core, can you send the comments? Also, is the "ISO25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies" under review? I have not seen the news, or I might have missed it already. marcia _________________________________________________________________ From: Asis-standards on behalf of Mark Needleman Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 3:54:06 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Folks i just cast the following votes in ISO Voted Confirm on the Systematic Review of ISO 3297:2007 Information and documentation -- International standard serial number (ISSN) Voted APPROVE on NWIP (New Work Item Proposal) ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes There are a few more standards ill be sending out soon Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 11:53:52 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Message-ID: Folks im sending out these reminders because i want to make sure people get them since ill be gone most of October at ASIST and on vacation in Europe - this 1st note has votes due in September - relevant documents attached Ill send out another note with later due dates Mark 1) ISO 3166/MA recommendation to ISO TC 46 This is a TC46 ballot to approve of the recommendations of ISO 3166/MA Recommendation to ISO/TC 46: Revision of ISO 3166 parts 1 to 3 Referring to Resolution 2014-04: Revision of ISO 3166 of ISO/TC 46 and after consultation with its members, the ISO 3166/MArecommends ISO/TC 46 to revise ISO 3166 parts 1 to 3 and requests ISO/TC 46 to: ? publish the rules for establishing the codes (normative text) separately from the codes themselves and information given in the tables since they are now available on the ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP) further asks ISO/TC 46 to note that: ? changes are released on OBP upon approval by the ISO 3166/MA voting members ? ISOCS no longer publishes multicolumn standards except for certain vocabularies Voting Requirements: You may vote to yes, no or abstain for this recommendation. Comments are required if vote no. Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/15/2016 2) ISO TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 ISO/TC 46 RESOLUTION 2016-09: Strategic business plan for TC 46 ISO/TC 46 instructs its Secretariat to distribute ISO/TC 46 strategic business plan and send it for a 3-month CIB ballot for review and comment by September 2016 before the ISO/TC 46 2016 strategic business plan is sent to ISO/CS for information to ISO TMB. ISO/TC 46 requests its sub-committees to distribute the draft of strategic business plan to their NMB for a 4-week comment period and provide feedback to the TC 46 Secretariat by the end of June. ISO/TC 46 instructs its Secretariat to review the comments received and distribute a revised draft for a 4-week CIB ballot by September 2016. The finalized ISO/TC 46 strategic business plan will be sent to ISO TMB. Your voting options are: YES - approve with the proposed revised TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 NO - you do not approve with the proposed revised TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments required) Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/22/2016 3) ISO/DTR 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings This ballot is a ISO/DTR (draft technical report) 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings. The ISO/TR 19814 Holdings Management technical report provides guidance and recommendations to plan, implement, maintain and improve preservation of archive and library holdings through holdings management. TR 19814 provides recommendations and guidance for preservation planning and ongoing management of physical archive and library holdings. TR 19814 applies to preservation of archive and library physical holdings of institutions and volumes small and large. It applies to all collections housed by an institution; their own holdings and deposits or loans from other institutions. Some information on digital collections - born digital and digitized for conservation is included for reference. TR 19814 also applies to holdings that are being managed by governmental agencies. TR 19814 includes procedures for managing holdings in the stacks, research and reading rooms, conservation facilities, and while on exhibit and during transportation. Guidance and recommendations for appropriate enclosures and containers for archive and library holdings are included. The guidance is intended for holdings that are being preserved for long-term use. Holdings intended for long-term use need to be managed to mitigate many risks that can cause loss, including catastrophic loss from fire and floods, risks of vandalism and theft, to instability of materials, including acetate film and acidic paper. Holdings management addresses the risks from a holistic perspective. It is recognized that compromises are necessary based on, among other factors, the quantity of holdings in archives and libraries. The compromises can be managed when the factors of use, significance, vulnerability of the holdings and the expertise and best practices from several fields are included in the decision-making process. This Technical Report (ISO/TR 19814) covers specifically the operations required to manage the holdings environment that are relevant to the preservation policy and plan of the institution. This includes the monitoring of climate stability, control of exposure to light, preventive cleanliness measures and cleaning of the holdings storage areas. Your voting options are: Approval - with the draft for publication Approval (with comments) - with the draft for publication but you have noted comments (comments required) Disapproval with the draft for publication (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/29/2016 -------------- next part -------------- Folks im sending out these reminders because i want to make sure people get them since ill be gone most of October at ASIST and on vacation in Europe - this 1st note has votes due in September - relevant documents attached Ill send out another note with later due dates Mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_TC_46_N2613.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 151475 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_TC_46_SC_10_N_166_-_ISO_DTR_19814.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 821554 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_TC46_Strategic_Business_Plan_2016.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 200770 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N2614.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 584096 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- 1) ISO 3166/MA recommendation to ISO TC 46 This is a TC46 ballot to approve of the recommendations of ISO 3166/MA Recommendation to ISO/TC 46: Revision of ISO 3166 parts 1 to 3 Referring to Resolution 2014-04: Revision of ISO 3166 of ISO/TC 46 and after consultation with its members, the ISO 3166/MArecommends ISO/TC 46 to revise ISO 3166 parts 1 to 3 and requests ISO/TC 46 to: ? publish the rules for establishing the codes (normative text) separately from the codes themselves and information given in the tables since they are now available on the ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP) further asks ISO/TC 46 to note that: ? changes are released on OBP upon approval by the ISO 3166/MA voting members ? ISOCS no longer publishes multicolumn standards except for certain vocabularies Voting Requirements: You may vote to yes, no or abstain for this recommendation. Comments are required if vote no. Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/15/2016 2) ISO TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 ISO/TC 46 RESOLUTION 2016-09: Strategic business plan for TC 46 ISO/TC 46 instructs its Secretariat to distribute ISO/TC 46 strategic business plan and send it for a 3-month CIB ballot for review and comment by September 2016 before the ISO/TC 46 2016 strategic business plan is sent to ISO/CS for information to ISO TMB. ISO/TC 46 requests its sub-committees to distribute the draft of strategic business plan to their NMB for a 4-week comment period and provide feedback to the TC 46 Secretariat by the end of June. ISO/TC 46 instructs its Secretariat to review the comments received and distribute a revised draft for a 4-week CIB ballot by September 2016. The finalized ISO/TC 46 strategic business plan will be sent to ISO TMB. Your voting options are: YES - approve with the proposed revised TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 NO - you do not approve with the proposed revised TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments required) Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/22/2016 3) ISO/DTR 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings This ballot is a ISO/DTR (draft technical report) 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings. The ISO/TR 19814 Holdings Management technical report provides guidance and recommendations to plan, implement, maintain and improve preservation of archive and library holdings through holdings management. TR 19814 provides recommendations and guidance for preservation planning and ongoing management of physical archive and library holdings. TR 19814 applies to preservation of archive and library physical holdings of institutions and volumes small and large. It applies to all collections housed by an institution; their own holdings and deposits or loans from other institutions. Some information on digital collections - born digital and digitized for conservation is included for reference. TR 19814 also applies to holdings that are being managed by governmental agencies. TR 19814 includes procedures for managing holdings in the stacks, research and reading rooms, conservation facilities, and while on exhibit and during transportation. Guidance and recommendations for appropriate enclosures and containers for archive and library holdings are included. The guidance is intended for holdings that are being preserved for long-term use. Holdings intended for long-term use need to be managed to mitigate many risks that can cause loss, including catastrophic loss from fire and floods, risks of vandalism and theft, to instability of materials, including acetate film and acidic paper. Holdings management addresses the risks from a holistic perspective. It is recognized that compromises are necessary based on, among other factors, the quantity of holdings in archives and libraries. The compromises can be managed when the factors of use, significance, vulnerability of the holdings and the expertise and best practices from several fields are included in the decision-making process. This Technical Report (ISO/TR 19814) covers specifically the operations required to manage the holdings environment that are relevant to the preservation policy and plan of the institution. This includes the monitoring of climate stability, control of exposure to light, preventive cleanliness measures and cleaning of the holdings storage areas. Your voting options are: Approval - with the draft for publication Approval (with comments) - with the draft for publication but you have noted comments (comments required) Disapproval with the draft for publication (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comments and a recommendation for a vote due by 9/29/2016 From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 12:22:58 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] Votes for the rest of 2016 Message-ID: Im sending out all of the current remaining votes for 2016 - ill be back from Europe by the time some of them are due but i wanted to give folks ample opportunity to review them -ill be splitting them into a couple of notes Mark 1) ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item This is a ballot for ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records for a new work item proposal. This Technical Specification provides guidance on how to carry out appraisal, and describes some of the products and outcomes that appraisal can deliver. As such, it describes a practical application of the concept of appraisal outlined in ISO 15489-1:2016. The Technical Specification: a) lists some of the main purposes for appraisal in the creation, capture and management of records in contemporary organizations and in society in general; b) describes the importance of establishing scope for an appraisal; c) explains how to analyze business activity and develop an understanding of the context; d) explains how to identify record requirements; e) describes the relationships between appraisal and records controls; and f) explains how to use risk to weigh appraisal decisions. This Technical Specification can be used by all organizations regardless of size, nature of their activities, or complexity of their functions and structure. In case this is disapproved, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Approve (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Disapprove [comments required with experts nominated] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] 2) ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation This is a TC46/SC4 ballot for ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation. The ISO ballot does not officially open until September 7, 2016, however the draft standard is distributed in advance to allow for local translations. We are opening the NISO ballot now to allow a longer period of review. DEPIP specifies a standardized framework for the various data (including both data and related metadata) exchange transactions between an Archive and its producers and consumers. Interchanges between archives (including archives integrated in organizations, public archives, storage service suppliers) are also considered. The protocol is generic and may be adapted to all types of information, whether printed or in a born digital format. The protocol defines five transactions (Transfer, Deliver, Dispose, Modify, and Restitute1) which Archives and their partners may use to exchange data objects. The protocol specifies also an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the protocol transaction (refer to the associated XSD Schema). The protocol specifies the syntax and semantics of these messages. This information shall be used by the implementers for development of applications which may generate and / or receive protocol messages. DEPIP is intended in particular for: a) Commercial software vendors, in order to complete/improve their applications; b) Archives, in order to standardize ingest of Data to be preserved and access to archived Data, and to facilitate the exchange of Data between Archives; c) Application programmers, in order to enable interoperable data transactions between Archives and the information systems they are developing; d) Third parties responsible of transferring documents to Archives; e) Data storage service suppliers. Administration may rely on this standard to: a) define its interoperability processes for preservation or align its already existing interoperability processes with best practices; b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation; c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever the descriptive models used. If this draft standard receives sufficient approval, it can proceed directly to publication. If it is either not approved, or the Working Group decides to make substantive changes based on ballot comments, an FDIS version may be balloted. Your voting options are: Yes - approve the standard for publication (comments are optional and should generally be editorial in nature; if substantive comments are provided, you are approving the standard even if those changes are not made) No - do not approve the standard for publication (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting (comments are optional) Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 3) TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format This is a TC46/SC4 ballot regarding technical content to ISO/DIS 28500 that must be approved before moving forward. This International Standard specifies the WARC file format: ? to store both the payload content and control information from mainstream Internet application layer protocols, such as the HTTP, DNS, and FTP; ? to store arbitrary metadata linked to other stored data (e.g. subject classifier, discovered language, encoding); ? to support data compression and maintain data record integrity; ? to store all control information from the harvesting protocol (e.g. request headers), not just response information; ? to store the results of data transformations linked to other stored data; ? to store a duplicate detection event linked to other stored data (to reduce storage in the presence of identical or substantially similar resources); ? to be extended without disruption to existing functionality; ? to support handling of overly long records by truncation or segmentation, where desired. Your voting options are: Approve - approve the technical content changes for this standard Approval with comments - approve the technical content changes for this standards but have comments (comments required) Disapprove - do not approve of the technical content changes for this standard (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 -------------- next part -------------- Im sending out all of the current remaining votes for 2016 - ill be back from Europe by the time some of them are due but i wanted to give folks ample opportunity to review them -ill be splitting them into a couple of notes Mark 1) ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item This is a ballot for ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records for a new work item proposal. This Technical Specification provides guidance on how to carry out appraisal, and describes some of the products and outcomes that appraisal can deliver. As such, it describes a practical application of the concept of appraisal outlined in ISO 15489-1:2016. The Technical Specification: a) lists some of the main purposes for appraisal in the creation, capture and management of records in contemporary organizations and in society in general; b) describes the importance of establishing scope for an appraisal; c) explains how to analyze business activity and develop an understanding of the context; d) explains how to identify record requirements; e) describes the relationships between appraisal and records controls; and f) explains how to use risk to weigh appraisal decisions. This Technical Specification can be used by all organizations regardless of size, nature of their activities, or complexity of their functions and structure. In case this is disapproved, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Approve (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Disapprove [comments required with experts nominated] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_DIS_20614(E)-Character_PDF_document.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 2266129 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_DIS_28500_(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 814510 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_NP_TS_21946_Form04.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 60737 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N1628_Appraisal_for_records.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 523002 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: National Information Standards Organization: Details for ballot: ISO:NP TS 21946 - ISO:TC 46:SC 11N1.webarchive Type: application/x-webarchive Size: 738032 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- 2) ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation This is a TC46/SC4 ballot for ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation. The ISO ballot does not officially open until September 7, 2016, however the draft standard is distributed in advance to allow for local translations. We are opening the NISO ballot now to allow a longer period of review. DEPIP specifies a standardized framework for the various data (including both data and related metadata) exchange transactions between an Archive and its producers and consumers. Interchanges between archives (including archives integrated in organizations, public archives, storage service suppliers) are also considered. The protocol is generic and may be adapted to all types of information, whether printed or in a born digital format. The protocol defines five transactions (Transfer, Deliver, Dispose, Modify, and Restitute1) which Archives and their partners may use to exchange data objects. The protocol specifies also an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the protocol transaction (refer to the associated XSD Schema). The protocol specifies the syntax and semantics of these messages. This information shall be used by the implementers for development of applications which may generate and / or receive protocol messages. DEPIP is intended in particular for: a) Commercial software vendors, in order to complete/improve their applications; b) Archives, in order to standardize ingest of Data to be preserved and access to archived Data, and to facilitate the exchange of Data between Archives; c) Application programmers, in order to enable interoperable data transactions between Archives and the information systems they are developing; d) Third parties responsible of transferring documents to Archives; e) Data storage service suppliers. Administration may rely on this standard to: a) define its interoperability processes for preservation or align its already existing interoperability processes with best practices; b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation; c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever the descriptive models used. If this draft standard receives sufficient approval, it can proceed directly to publication. If it is either not approved, or the Working Group decides to make substantive changes based on ballot comments, an FDIS version may be balloted. Your voting options are: Yes - approve the standard for publication (comments are optional and should generally be editorial in nature; if substantive comments are provided, you are approving the standard even if those changes are not made) No - do not approve the standard for publication (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting (comments are optional) Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 3) TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format This is a TC46/SC4 ballot regarding technical content to ISO/DIS 28500 that must be approved before moving forward. This International Standard specifies the WARC file format: ? to store both the payload content and control information from mainstream Internet application layer protocols, such as the HTTP, DNS, and FTP; ? to store arbitrary metadata linked to other stored data (e.g. subject classifier, discovered language, encoding); ? to support data compression and maintain data record integrity; ? to store all control information from the harvesting protocol (e.g. request headers), not just response information; ? to store the results of data transformations linked to other stored data; ? to store a duplicate detection event linked to other stored data (to reduce storage in the presence of identical or substantially similar resources); ? to be extended without disruption to existing functionality; ? to support handling of overly long records by truncation or segmentation, where desired. Your voting options are: Approve - approve the technical content changes for this standard Approval with comments - approve the technical content changes for this standards but have comments (comments required) Disapprove - do not approve of the technical content changes for this standard (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 12:22:58 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] Votes for the rest of 2016 Message-ID: Im sending out all of the current remaining votes for 2016 - ill be back from Europe by the time some of them are due but i wanted to give folks ample opportunity to review them -ill be splitting them into a couple of notes Mark 1) ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item This is a ballot for ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records for a new work item proposal. This Technical Specification provides guidance on how to carry out appraisal, and describes some of the products and outcomes that appraisal can deliver. As such, it describes a practical application of the concept of appraisal outlined in ISO 15489-1:2016. The Technical Specification: a) lists some of the main purposes for appraisal in the creation, capture and management of records in contemporary organizations and in society in general; b) describes the importance of establishing scope for an appraisal; c) explains how to analyze business activity and develop an understanding of the context; d) explains how to identify record requirements; e) describes the relationships between appraisal and records controls; and f) explains how to use risk to weigh appraisal decisions. This Technical Specification can be used by all organizations regardless of size, nature of their activities, or complexity of their functions and structure. In case this is disapproved, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Approve (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Disapprove [comments required with experts nominated] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] 2) ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation This is a TC46/SC4 ballot for ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation. The ISO ballot does not officially open until September 7, 2016, however the draft standard is distributed in advance to allow for local translations. We are opening the NISO ballot now to allow a longer period of review. DEPIP specifies a standardized framework for the various data (including both data and related metadata) exchange transactions between an Archive and its producers and consumers. Interchanges between archives (including archives integrated in organizations, public archives, storage service suppliers) are also considered. The protocol is generic and may be adapted to all types of information, whether printed or in a born digital format. The protocol defines five transactions (Transfer, Deliver, Dispose, Modify, and Restitute1) which Archives and their partners may use to exchange data objects. The protocol specifies also an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the protocol transaction (refer to the associated XSD Schema). The protocol specifies the syntax and semantics of these messages. This information shall be used by the implementers for development of applications which may generate and / or receive protocol messages. DEPIP is intended in particular for: a) Commercial software vendors, in order to complete/improve their applications; b) Archives, in order to standardize ingest of Data to be preserved and access to archived Data, and to facilitate the exchange of Data between Archives; c) Application programmers, in order to enable interoperable data transactions between Archives and the information systems they are developing; d) Third parties responsible of transferring documents to Archives; e) Data storage service suppliers. Administration may rely on this standard to: a) define its interoperability processes for preservation or align its already existing interoperability processes with best practices; b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation; c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever the descriptive models used. If this draft standard receives sufficient approval, it can proceed directly to publication. If it is either not approved, or the Working Group decides to make substantive changes based on ballot comments, an FDIS version may be balloted. Your voting options are: Yes - approve the standard for publication (comments are optional and should generally be editorial in nature; if substantive comments are provided, you are approving the standard even if those changes are not made) No - do not approve the standard for publication (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting (comments are optional) Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 3) TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format This is a TC46/SC4 ballot regarding technical content to ISO/DIS 28500 that must be approved before moving forward. This International Standard specifies the WARC file format: ? to store both the payload content and control information from mainstream Internet application layer protocols, such as the HTTP, DNS, and FTP; ? to store arbitrary metadata linked to other stored data (e.g. subject classifier, discovered language, encoding); ? to support data compression and maintain data record integrity; ? to store all control information from the harvesting protocol (e.g. request headers), not just response information; ? to store the results of data transformations linked to other stored data; ? to store a duplicate detection event linked to other stored data (to reduce storage in the presence of identical or substantially similar resources); ? to be extended without disruption to existing functionality; ? to support handling of overly long records by truncation or segmentation, where desired. Your voting options are: Approve - approve the technical content changes for this standard Approval with comments - approve the technical content changes for this standards but have comments (comments required) Disapprove - do not approve of the technical content changes for this standard (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 -------------- next part -------------- Im sending out all of the current remaining votes for 2016 - ill be back from Europe by the time some of them are due but i wanted to give folks ample opportunity to review them -ill be splitting them into a couple of notes Mark 1) ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records - New Work Item This is a ballot for ISO/NP TS 21946 - ISO/TC 46/SC 11N1628 - Information and documentation -- Appraisal for managing records for a new work item proposal. This Technical Specification provides guidance on how to carry out appraisal, and describes some of the products and outcomes that appraisal can deliver. As such, it describes a practical application of the concept of appraisal outlined in ISO 15489-1:2016. The Technical Specification: a) lists some of the main purposes for appraisal in the creation, capture and management of records in contemporary organizations and in society in general; b) describes the importance of establishing scope for an appraisal; c) explains how to analyze business activity and develop an understanding of the context; d) explains how to identify record requirements; e) describes the relationships between appraisal and records controls; and f) explains how to use risk to weigh appraisal decisions. This Technical Specification can be used by all organizations regardless of size, nature of their activities, or complexity of their functions and structure. In case this is disapproved, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Approve (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Disapprove [comments required with experts nominated] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_DIS_20614(E)-Character_PDF_document.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 2266129 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_DIS_28500_(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 814510 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_NP_TS_21946_Form04.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 60737 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N1628_Appraisal_for_records.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 523002 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: National Information Standards Organization: Details for ballot: ISO:NP TS 21946 - ISO:TC 46:SC 11N1.webarchive Type: application/x-webarchive Size: 738032 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- 2) ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation This is a TC46/SC4 ballot for ISO/DIS 20614, Data exchange protocol for interoperability and preservation. The ISO ballot does not officially open until September 7, 2016, however the draft standard is distributed in advance to allow for local translations. We are opening the NISO ballot now to allow a longer period of review. DEPIP specifies a standardized framework for the various data (including both data and related metadata) exchange transactions between an Archive and its producers and consumers. Interchanges between archives (including archives integrated in organizations, public archives, storage service suppliers) are also considered. The protocol is generic and may be adapted to all types of information, whether printed or in a born digital format. The protocol defines five transactions (Transfer, Deliver, Dispose, Modify, and Restitute1) which Archives and their partners may use to exchange data objects. The protocol specifies also an implementation framework using the XML formalism to write the messages that are exchanged during the protocol transaction (refer to the associated XSD Schema). The protocol specifies the syntax and semantics of these messages. This information shall be used by the implementers for development of applications which may generate and / or receive protocol messages. DEPIP is intended in particular for: a) Commercial software vendors, in order to complete/improve their applications; b) Archives, in order to standardize ingest of Data to be preserved and access to archived Data, and to facilitate the exchange of Data between Archives; c) Application programmers, in order to enable interoperable data transactions between Archives and the information systems they are developing; d) Third parties responsible of transferring documents to Archives; e) Data storage service suppliers. Administration may rely on this standard to: a) define its interoperability processes for preservation or align its already existing interoperability processes with best practices; b) organize the interoperability processes for preservation; c) control the creation and management of metadata, whatever the descriptive models used. If this draft standard receives sufficient approval, it can proceed directly to publication. If it is either not approved, or the Working Group decides to make substantive changes based on ballot comments, an FDIS version may be balloted. Your voting options are: Yes - approve the standard for publication (comments are optional and should generally be editorial in nature; if substantive comments are provided, you are approving the standard even if those changes are not made) No - do not approve the standard for publication (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting (comments are optional) Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 3) TC46/SC4, ISO/DIS 28500 (Ed 2), Information and documentation -- WARC file format This is a TC46/SC4 ballot regarding technical content to ISO/DIS 28500 that must be approved before moving forward. This International Standard specifies the WARC file format: ? to store both the payload content and control information from mainstream Internet application layer protocols, such as the HTTP, DNS, and FTP; ? to store arbitrary metadata linked to other stored data (e.g. subject classifier, discovered language, encoding); ? to support data compression and maintain data record integrity; ? to store all control information from the harvesting protocol (e.g. request headers), not just response information; ? to store the results of data transformations linked to other stored data; ? to store a duplicate detection event linked to other stored data (to reduce storage in the presence of identical or substantially similar resources); ? to be extended without disruption to existing functionality; ? to support handling of overly long records by truncation or segmentation, where desired. Your voting options are: Approve - approve the technical content changes for this standard Approval with comments - approve the technical content changes for this standards but have comments (comments required) Disapprove - do not approve of the technical content changes for this standard (comments are required and should be substantive) Abstain from voting Comments an a recommendation for a vote due 11/17/2016 From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 12:37:30 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] 2016 Votes (2) Message-ID: <67C8BB33-8154-43F1-9491-55118D037C44@yahoo.com> Here are 2 more - 1 more note to come Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This International Standard specifies the International Standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises a set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum impact on already existing systems. An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g. creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives, museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these organizations (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions). An ISIL identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units throughout its life. In some cases, such as when an organization has undergone a significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL identifier can be allocated. Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this International Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library, archive, museum or related organization, administrative unit or subordinate unit, acting autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL is not intended to be used to classify organizations or their services and holdings. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) 2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification (see Annex A). This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of publication: a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed free of charge, including 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, industrial and tourist advertising, and 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress in some branch of industry or commerce; b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical examples are 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, 4) calendars, and 5) electronic texts under development; c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the words, and 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28/2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) -------------- next part -------------- Here are 2 more - 1 more note to come Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 15511:2011 (Ed 3) - Information and documentation -- International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL) This International Standard specifies the International Standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL), whichcomprises a set of standard identifiers used for the unique identification of libraries, archives, museums and related organizations with a minimum impact on already existing systems. An ISIL identifies an organization, i.e. a library, an archive, a museum or a related organization, or one of its subordinate units, which is responsible for an action or service in an informational environment (e.g. creation of machine-readable information). It can be used to identify the originator or holder of a resource (e.g. library material or a collection in an archive). The ISIL is intended for use by libraries, archives, museums and agencies doing business or interacting with these organizations (e.g. suppliers, publishers, and government institutions). An ISIL identifies an organization or one of its subordinate units throughout its life. In some cases, such as when an organization has undergone a significant administrative change (e.g. a merger with another organization), particularly one that results in a name change, a new ISIL identifier can be allocated. Since this International Standard allows the use of existing codes to be incorporated into the ISIL, it is possible that a given organization can have more than one ISIL. However, it is the intention of this International Standard to minimize the number of codes. Any library, archive, museum or related organization, administrative unit or subordinate unit, acting autonomously, can be allocated an ISIL. An ISIL is not intended to be used to classify organizations or their services and holdings. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/17/2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) 2) Systematic Review of ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC8 standard ISO 9707:2008 - Information and documentation -- Statistics on the production and distribution of books, newspapers, periodicals and electronic publications This International Standard gives guidance on the keeping of national statistics to provide standardized information on various aspects of the production and distribution of printed, electronic and micro-publications (essentially books, newspapers and periodicals). In addition, this International Standard provides recommendations on subject classification (see Annex A). This International Standard is not applicable to the following types of publication: a) publications issued for advertising purposes, where the literary or scientific text is subsidiary and where the publications are distributed free of charge, including 1) trade catalogues, prospectuses and other types of commercial, industrial and tourist advertising, and 2) publications advertising products or services supplied by the publisher, even though they might describe activities or technical progress in some branch of industry or commerce; b) publications considered to be of a transitory character; typical examples are 1) timetables, price-lists, telephone directories, 2) programmes of entertainments, exhibitions, fairs, 3) company regulations, reports and directives and circulars, 4) calendars, and 5) electronic texts under development; c) publications in which the text is not the most important part, including 1) printed music documents where the music is more important than the words, and 2) maps and charts (with the exception of atlases), e.g. astronomical charts, hydrographical and geographical maps, wall maps, road maps, geological surveys in map form and topographical plans. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/28 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: C057332e.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 311510 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: C057332f.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 248191 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 9707;2008(E)-Character PDF document .pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 185105 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 9707;2008(F)-Character PDF document .pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 193234 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- /2016 - If the vote is to revise and you want to be on the committee or know someone who would make a good member get me the contact details (and of course that persons agreement if its not you) From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 13:44:48 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] 2016 votes (3) References: Message-ID: <44E28355-9993-4F81-AA23-2EBCDAC45DAF@yahoo.com> > > > The last note (for now) > > Mark > > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval > > This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them. > > This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data. > > This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri. > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose. > > This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: > > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you) > > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange > > This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange > > This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. > > It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format. > > This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: > 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? > > 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? > > 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? > > 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? > > 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: > > Industry and Commerce > Government > Consumers > Labour > Academic and Research Bodies > Standards Application > Non-governmental Organization (NGO) > > Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. > > Your voting options are: > > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] > Withdraw [comments required] > Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] > Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you) > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- The last note (for now) Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them. This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data. This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose. This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you) 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records. It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format. This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote: 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication? 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified? 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard? 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country? 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert?s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories: Industry and Commerce Government Consumers Labour Academic and Research Bodies Standards Application Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional] Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 2709;2008(E)-Character PDF document.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 718056 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 25964-1;2011(E)-Character PDF document .pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 7324406 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Sep 13 21:04:40 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] Dublin Core Metadata Standard - New Work Item Message-ID: Folks NISO has informed me they still need an expert to serve on the working group for ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes - New Work Item If anyone on the committee is interested or know of someone who might make a good member of this working group let me know ASAP so i can get their contact information to NISO Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks NISO has informed me they still need an expert to serve on the working group for ISO/NP 15836-2 - Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set -- Part 2: DCMI Properties and classes - New Work Item If anyone on the committee is interested or know of someone who might make a good member of this working group let me know ASAP so i can get their contact information to NISO Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Sat Sep 17 12:13:02 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: Folks i just cast the following vote in ISO Voted YES on ISO 3166/MA recommendation to ISO TC 46 Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks i just cast the following vote in ISO Voted YES on ISO 3166/MA recommendation to ISO TC 46 Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Thu Sep 22 10:00:04 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: NISO Releases Altmetrics Recommended Practice References: <1125923854694.1121387823279.1917486566.0.250958JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> Message-ID: <7CF2B8F0-5E47-4036-B378-5D08E94962E0@yahoo.com> FYI mark > Begin forwarded message: > > From: NISO > Subject: NISO Releases Altmetrics Recommended Practice > Date: September 22, 2016 at 9:58:30 AM EDT > To: needleman_mark at yahoo.com > Reply-To: nisohq at niso.org > > > > > > For Immediate Release > > > > > > > NISO Releases Altmetrics Recommended Practice > > Baltimore, MD - September 22, 2016 - The National Information Standards Organization has published NISO RP-25-2016, Outputs of the NISO Alternative Assessment Project . This recommended practice on altmetrics, an expansion of the tools available for measuring the scholarly impact of research in the knowledge environment, was developed by working groups that were part of NISO's Altmetrics Initiative, a project funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The document outlines altmetrics definitions and use cases, alternative outputs in scholarly communications, data metrics, and persistent identifiers in scholarly communications. This guidance was necessary because, before the project began, scholars had long expressed dissatisfaction with traditional measures of success, such as the Impact Factor, but needed standards relating to other viable assessment methods. > > Outputs of the NISO Alternative Assessment Project represents the culmination of work that began with brainstorming sessions in 2013 and that included multiple in-person and virtual meetings, a white paper, conference presentations that gathered community input, and votes on draft documents by NISO's voting membership. The effort built on NISO's strength as a consensus-seeking organization to bring multiple perspectives, nuances, and needs into one set of recommendations upon which the scholarly community can rely. Scholars will find that the recommended practice addresses high-level ideas, such as the need for guidance on altmetrics, but also provides granular information on such topics as how the various metrics-providing vendors generate their data. Users of metrics will also find templates for starting work at their own institutions, as the intent is for the recommended practice to make altmetrics more widely used and more approachable than previously. Institutions can begin to apply these new metrics with greater confidence in their development, data gathering, and application. > > "NISO is proud to contribute to the advancement of new assessment forms that encourage extensions of scholarly communication forms and methods," said Executive Director Todd Carpenter. "Over the past three years, we have been able to bring together experts from throughout the scholarly publishing and assessment communities to expand the toolset available to review the impact of researchers' work. Consensus-building is always a challenging endeavor, but it is considerably more so in a domain that could influence important advancement, funding, and recognition decisions. The thoughts around altmetrics when we began this initiative in 2013 were only vaguely formed. It has been exciting to watch the project grow from very nascent understandings of altmetrics, to a place of greater understanding of just how rich altmetrics are and how they can be applied." Carpenter continued, "it's my hope that the recommendations that our working groups so carefully crafted will guide users toward optimal uses of the newly available data that can be such a benefit to their careers and institutions." > > Euan Adie, Founder and CEO, Altmetric, commented that, "We had some misgivings at the beginning of the process [in 2013] as it seemed too early for stakeholders or providers to contribute in a meaningful way, but actually the results turned out to be sensible and useful. NISO very ably guided the process and I don't think the community could have pulled anything like this together without them. The market has responded very positively, and in my opinion what got produced is helping both the understanding and uptake of alternative metrics. Furthermore, from a supplier's perspective, the Data Quality Code of Conduct has been very useful to lay down ground rules for future product development." > > "The NISO Altmetrics project was announced at a time when the field was still in a very active stage of development," noted Mike Taylor, formerly Senior Product Manager, Informetrics, Elsevier, and now Head of Metrics Development, Digital Science. "Despite that," he observed, "the project enabled experts in the community to have structured conversations around (a) what work was in a sufficiently mature state to publish recommendations, (b) what emerging behavior and research outputs were sufficiently similar to existing ones to 'borrow' standards, (c) what indicators about data quality could be usefully published, and (d) tackling some of the issues of emerging vocabulary." Taylor continued, "For me, one of the important outcomes was the opportunity to link many diverse and unconnected working groups into a developing network of stakeholders. There will be much future work to emerge from this network." > > About NISO > NISO, based in Baltimore, Maryland, fosters the development and maintenance of standards that facilitate the creation, persistent management, and effective interchange of information so that it can be trusted for use in research and learning. To fulfill this mission, NISO engages libraries, publishers, information aggregators, and other organizations that support learning, research, and scholarship through the creation, organization, management, and curation of knowledge. NISO works with intersecting communities of interest and across the entire lifecycle of information standards. NISO is a not-for-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For more information, visit the NISO website . > > For More Information, Contact: > Nettie Lagace > NISO > Phone: 301-654-2512 > Email Nettie Lagace > NISO | (301) 654-2512 | nisohq at niso.org | www.niso.org > > > NISO, 3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 302, Baltimore, MD 21211 > SafeUnsubscribe??needleman_mark at yahoo.com > Update Profile | About our service provider > Sent by nisohq at niso.org in collaboration with > > Try it free today -------------- next part -------------- FYI mark Begin forwarded message: From: NISO <[1]nisohq at niso.org> Subject: NISO Releases Altmetrics Recommended Practice Date: September 22, 2016 at 9:58:30 AM EDT To: [2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com Reply-To: [3]nisohq at niso.org [s.gif] For Immediate Release [10ff106c-f556-4314-9d18-0ec851ae3a1a.png] [S.gif] NISO Releases Altmetrics Recommended Practice Baltimore, MD - September 22, 2016 - The National Information Standards Organization has published [4]NISO RP-25-2016, Outputs of the NISO Alternative Assessment Project. This recommended practice on altmetrics, an expansion of the tools available for measuring the scholarly impact of research in the knowledge environment, was developed by working groups that were part of NISO's Altmetrics Initiative, a project funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The document outlines altmetrics definitions and use cases, alternative outputs in scholarly communications, data metrics, and persistent identifiers in scholarly communications. This guidance was necessary because, before the project began, scholars had long expressed dissatisfaction with traditional measures of success, such as the Impact Factor, but needed standards relating to other viable assessment methods. Outputs of the NISO Alternative Assessment Project represents the culmination of work that began with brainstorming sessions in 2013 and that included multiple in-person and virtual meetings, a white paper, conference presentations that gathered community input, and votes on draft documents by NISO's voting membership. The effort built on NISO's strength as a consensus-seeking organization to bring multiple perspectives, nuances, and needs into one set of recommendations upon which the scholarly community can rely. Scholars will find that the recommended practice addresses high-level ideas, such as the need for guidance on altmetrics, but also provides granular information on such topics as how the various metrics-providing vendors generate their data. Users of metrics will also find templates for starting work at their own institutions, as the intent is for the recommended practice to make altmetrics more widely used and more approachable than previously. Institutions can begin to apply these new metrics with greater confidence in their development, data gathering, and application. "NISO is proud to contribute to the advancement of new assessment forms that encourage extensions of scholarly communication forms and methods," said Executive Director Todd Carpenter. "Over the past three years, we have been able to bring together experts from throughout the scholarly publishing and assessment communities to expand the toolset available to review the impact of researchers' work. Consensus-building is always a challenging endeavor, but it is considerably more so in a domain that could influence important advancement, funding, and recognition decisions. The thoughts around altmetrics when we began this initiative in 2013 were only vaguely formed. It has been exciting to watch the project grow from very nascent understandings of altmetrics, to a place of greater understanding of just how rich altmetrics are and how they can be applied." Carpenter continued, "it's my hope that the recommendations that our working groups so carefully crafted will guide users toward optimal uses of the newly available data that can be such a benefit to their careers and institutions." Euan Adie, Founder and CEO, Altmetric, commented that, "We had some misgivings at the beginning of the process [in 2013] as it seemed too early for stakeholders or providers to contribute in a meaningful way, but actually the results turned out to be sensible and useful. NISO very ably guided the process and I don't think the community could have pulled anything like this together without them. The market has responded very positively, and in my opinion what got produced is helping both the understanding and uptake of alternative metrics. Furthermore, from a supplier's perspective, the Data Quality Code of Conduct has been very useful to lay down ground rules for future product development." "The NISO Altmetrics project was announced at a time when the field was still in a very active stage of development," noted Mike Taylor, formerly Senior Product Manager, Informetrics, Elsevier, and now Head of Metrics Development, Digital Science. "Despite that," he observed, "the project enabled experts in the community to have structured conversations around (a) what work was in a sufficiently mature state to publish recommendations, (b) what emerging behavior and research outputs were sufficiently similar to existing ones to 'borrow' standards, (c) what indicators about data quality could be usefully published, and (d) tackling some of the issues of emerging vocabulary." Taylor continued, "For me, one of the important outcomes was the opportunity to link many diverse and unconnected working groups into a developing network of stakeholders. There will be much future work to emerge from this network." About NISO NISO, based in Baltimore, Maryland, fosters the development and maintenance of standards that facilitate the creation, persistent management, and effective interchange of information so that it can be trusted for use in research and learning. To fulfill this mission, NISO engages libraries, publishers, information aggregators, and other organizations that support learning, research, and scholarship through the creation, organization, management, and curation of knowledge. NISO works with intersecting communities of interest and across the entire lifecycle of information standards. NISO is a not-for-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For more information, visit the [5]NISO website. For More Information, Contact: Nettie Lagace NISO Phone: 301-654-2512 Email [6]Nettie Lagace NISO | (301) 654-2512 | [7]nisohq at niso.org | [8]www.niso.org [S.gif] NISO, 3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 302, Baltimore, MD 21211 [9]SafeUnsubscribe? needleman_mark at yahoo.com [10]Update Profile | [11]About our service provider Sent by [12]nisohq at niso.org in collaboration with [13]Constant Contact [14]Try it free today [S.gif] References Visible links 1. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 4. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001LoaQm5wvVKU1G_RhnGp3r0tggLTbBoEq2w2BT-U0heTFgR7-SKEf9nVfIZ2OPyIa19lTxEY9MCo0syLcOciBtKCxTBf95eR6sabG7eGuMxqpMoVpK6I0TAJKOLozB5ybDVthhnr60swkTVeexz7WZAUeGMj8ZhGXIWqih2IHJTU5OuD51JEoGoCp9ESTeibVQlIzeuzHcuL7Q28-5GwTzwMUgUyIQZqK5RqjXUzURQhQ-OgsLr8Cf6GkhHkR8fVEa3XisPoZ6CUbeKAf_RnoH4C-6jRZU30K_dku4EWpOvlcbAw7taX8zVs9yoiiHHtAlipUUZ63Nmk2x2sRjmWtCYlLPSGiECzXcG30NwFa1O4=&c=dJDxGZJRMPuIkAYuDH41wGdJUM63Svxarapiw8XU0lL7shEaIpBT7g==&ch=Af55sAmMC9sswXV4Xxk0PCkStqUcdYpHF91H26ZoQ72_8Kx0CJPVwg== 5. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001LoaQm5wvVKU1G_RhnGp3r0tggLTbBoEq2w2BT-U0heTFgR7-SKEf9s4E8H5i5nPT8-dqY_0WZJZB3Hmp_dp9aDNESBMYS4CZvkqd_dAyoM4qyQjmSCqCq69ZAC8BfTIsKqLIO0ioMCkJP1hGFsRHSo_l80aELAYL&c=dJDxGZJRMPuIkAYuDH41wGdJUM63Svxarapiw8XU0lL7shEaIpBT7g==&ch=Af55sAmMC9sswXV4Xxk0PCkStqUcdYpHF91H26ZoQ72_8Kx0CJPVwg== 6. mailto:nlagace at niso.org 7. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 8. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001LoaQm5wvVKU1G_RhnGp3r0tggLTbBoEq2w2BT-U0heTFgR7-SKEf9s4E8H5i5nPT8-dqY_0WZJZB3Hmp_dp9aDNESBMYS4CZvkqd_dAyoM4qyQjmSCqCq69ZAC8BfTIsKqLIO0ioMCkJP1hGFsRHSo_l80aELAYL&c=dJDxGZJRMPuIkAYuDH41wGdJUM63Svxarapiw8XU0lL7shEaIpBT7g==&ch=Af55sAmMC9sswXV4Xxk0PCkStqUcdYpHF91H26ZoQ72_8Kx0CJPVwg== 9. https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=001vxR5oH7oJeHq5TUcqRW79g%3D%3D&ch=947f7fa0-9a90-11e5-a61e-d4ae52733bf0&ca=3c4f66f3-91a0-4979-a90d-eacaee84a16f 10. https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=001vxR5oH7oJeHq5TUcqRW79g%3D%3D&ch=947f7fa0-9a90-11e5-a61e-d4ae52733bf0&ca=3c4f66f3-91a0-4979-a90d-eacaee84a16f 11. http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-provider 12. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 13. http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=PT1142 14. http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=PT1142 Hidden links: 15. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001LoaQm5wvVKU1G_RhnGp3r0tggLTbBoEq2w2BT-U0heTFgR7-SKEf9s4E8H5i5nPT8-dqY_0WZJZB3Hmp_dp9aDNESBMYS4CZvkqd_dAyoM4qyQjmSCqCq69ZAC8BfTIsKqLIO0ioMCkJP1hGFsRHSo_l80aELAYL&c=dJDxGZJRMPuIkAYuDH41wGdJUM63Svxarapiw8XU0lL7shEaIpBT7g==&ch=Af55sAmMC9sswXV4Xxk0PCkStqUcdYpHF91H26ZoQ72_8Kx0CJPVwg== From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Thu Sep 22 16:47:23 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: <75C420AA-EAB6-4866-ACA6-15549BBD0A29@yahoo.com> Folks i just cast the following vote Voted YES on ISO TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 if anyone has any problems with this we have until tomorrow (9/23) to change our vote Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks i just cast the following vote Voted YES on ISO TC46 Strategic Business Plan 2016 if anyone has any problems with this we have until tomorrow (9/23) to change our vote Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Fri Sep 30 15:27:48 2016 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: Folks Hearing no comments from anyone I just cast the following vote Voted APPROVE on ISO/DTR 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks Hearing no comments from anyone I just cast the following vote Voted APPROVE on ISO/DTR 19814 - ISO/TC 46/SC10 N166 - Information and documentation -- Holdings management for archive and library holdings Mark